A Secular Humanist Jew's Thoughts on Yom Kippur: On Atheism and Theism, and on Religion and Political Religion
"Either this nation shall kill racism, or racism shall kill this nation." (S. Jonas, August, 2018)
Maurycy Gottlieb - Jews Praying in the Synagogue on Yom Kippur.
And then there are we secular Jews --- all of us Jews, to be sure.
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org), Author: Author Not Given) Details Source DMCA
Introduction
This is the second update that I have published for this column. I published the original version just about nine years ago. It seems, unfortunately, that the time has come to publish it again. With the gradual movement of the Republican Party towards Christian Nationalism and Dominionism (see e.g., Rep. Lauren Boebert's comments on that subject), periodic review of the subject of this column becomes justified. Since the time of the first publication of this column, of course, a minority of voters, through the Electoral College which exists because of the original sin of this nation, the institution of human slavery, elected a peculiar sort of President (no further timeliness comment needed). Despite the fact that he is totally irreligious himself, like the leadership of the Republican Party since the time of Reagan he supports the policies of the intended religious authoritarianism of the Religious Right. And so, with the otherwise non-religious died-in-the-wool racists, its members form perhaps his most devoted following.
The religious authoritarianism of the Republican Religious Right not only criminalizes thought as to, say, when life begins, of all other religious people, but of course it also heavily impacts the thoughts and actions of the secular folk among us as well. I am a Secular Humanist Jew. I have much to fear personally from the Religious Right in this country, especially as their political power is advanced by the Republican Party.
As I have said numerous times in these pages, the assault on legal abortion goes well beyond the matter of the woman's right to choose (a right in which I firmly believe). It goes to, as I said above, the criminalization of certain beliefs/values of both religious and non-religious persons who do not happen to accept the Religious Right's religious position (and for them it is clearly a religious matter, based either in a particular Biblical interpretation or a papal doctrine) on when life begins.
And so, it is in this context, just after the celebration of Yom Kippur this year (Oct. 4-5) that I once again share these thoughts with you.
On Yom Kippur for Secular Humanist Jews
For Secular Humanist Jews Yom Kippur is not a day of atonement, as it is for theist Jews. We may well have done ethically wrong things in the past year, but we do not regard them as "sins." "Sin" is a religious concept requiring the existence of an unknown, unknowable, and unprovable, yet somehow all-powerful, super-natural being which at some level has control over our lives or parts of them. In contrast, for Secular Humanist Jews Yom Kippur, the most important day in the Jewish calendar, is a day of renewal and rededication. We reflect, we restore, we renew -- we look ahead, not behind.
I should like to make it clear that I do not have a problem with theists, per se. Yes, I do understand and agree with all of the arguments against the existence of an unknown, unknowable and unprovable "God" or "Gods" (think Hinduism, of which there are about 1 billion adherents). But I do think that it is a waste of time to argue against the concept, and worse to make fun of it, that the majority of the world's population, who are theists of one sort or another, hold to. My concern is with the negative aspects of organized religion (and of course there are many positive aspects of it as well) and the negative impact that those aspects can have not only on atheists like me but on many believers who just do not happen to agree with the positions and power held by certain organized religions.
On Secular Humanism, and Non-Political and Political Religion
The problem, for atheists/humanists and, at many times in history theists of one sort confronting theists of another sort as well, is Politicized Religion, like that which has dominated the Roman Catholic Church has been since the time of St. Augustine, if not before, like the Republican/Religious Right (political by definition), like political Islam, like indeed political Orthodox Judaism in modern Israel. Our argument is not, or should not be, with belief and the believers. The struggle of humanists and believers alike who are devoted to the fundamental interests of humanity must be focused not on each other but on our common enemy: those who use religion to advance their own political and economic interests to arrogate to themselves and their patrons, resources and the product of economic activity that neither benefit humanity as a whole nor have anything to do with religion. Those resources, as mentioned, are otherwise known variously as "corporatism," the "global economy [privately held]," and capitalism.
Further, humanists and tolerant believers alike must struggle against those believers who would criminalize the thoughts and actions of both religious and non-believers alike over such matters as: when life begins; to whom the civil institution of marriage is to be made available; and which segments of the population may be discriminated against in the public square, by those "religious" who take offense at the others' beliefs and practices. It must be understood by all that over the centuries of human civilization, more of our brethren have been killed in religious wars, or wars waged for "religious" reasons, or in wars in which organized religions have been an ally of one or more of the warring states, than for all of the other causes put together.
In the Second World War, hardly a religious war in the sense that the Crusades or the Catholic/Protestant wars of 16th and 17th century Europe were, nevertheless on the belt buckle of every German Wehrmacht soldier was the slogan (originated by the Prussian Chancellor Otto von Bismarck in the 1880s) "Gott mit Uns" (God [is] with Us). (As it happens SS troopers did not have the slogan on their belt buckles.) During the same war, the traditional Japanese religion of ancestor worship, Shinto, was mobilized by the Japanese fascist leadership to help them mobilize the whole population behind the war effort.
The Catholic Church was closely allied with both Benito Mussolini's (Italian) and Francisco Franco's (Spanish) fascist states. Further the Catholic Church in Rome made a pact with the German Nazi government that in return for "leaving the German Catholics alone," the Pope would leave what the Hitlerites were doing, first to the "non-Aryan" German people, and then to the populations of Europe as a whole, alone. In the United States fortunately, although one of the most prominent pre-war anti-Semites was a Catholic cleric, Father Charles Coughlin, unlike what happened in Europe the Catholic Church did not play the direct role as an ally of government as it did in Europe. But once the U.S. entered World War II, there were the frequent imprecations to God for support in battle. There was even a popular song that I remember well from my youth during that conflict: "Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition."
Religious Authoritarianism and the Republican Party
Presently, The US Republican Party runs in major part on the issues that are central to the Fundamentalist Christians, and Jews (see my column "Jews for Hitler"), who are central to the Republican base: homophobia, religious determinism in policy governing the outcome of pregnancy, the introduction of organized religious activity into the public schools, and in general the steady erosion of the Constitutional boundaries separating church and state. In political Islam, "Islamism" is very clear that its goal is to take full political power so that it may rule under the provisions of "Sharia Law." (Funnily enough, many of the provisions of Sharia Law, against which the Islamophobes of the Republican Religious Right just love to rail, are strikingly similar to the law that the latter would like to impose across the United States.)
The central feature of both is that "religious law" (as they interpret it of course) should stand above any civil constitution. Don't believe me? Just ask Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, the Dominionists Mike Huckabee, Lauren Boebert, and Mike Pence, and Antonin Scalia (if you can reach him beyond the grave), and etc. For many Israelis on the Right, the whole policy that has been followed by their Right-wing governments over the years, that is the gradual erosion and (the hoped for) eventual expulsion (voluntary or involuntary) of the Arab population in the Occupied Territories, is based on the Biblical concept of the "Land of Israel."
(As it happens, [note the promo here]. through my writing I have been fighting the forces of the Republican Religious Right for some years. The original of my current book The 15% Solution: How the Republican Religious Right took Control of the U.S., 1981-2022: A Futuristic Novel (Click Here) was published in 1996.)
A Secular Humanist Jew's Statement of Renewal, on Yom Kippur
And so, what was my renewal the Jewish New Year in 2013, and once again in 2018, and yet once again in 2022? To rededicate myself to that struggle, and to, from time-to-time, feature the line of reasoning that I have outlined above. Let me make it clear once again, that our struggle is not with religion, per se, nor with its adherents, as individuals. Our struggle is most correctly with Political Religion when it is used to further the interests of Reaction by every government around the world that does use it in that way, in one way or another. That is our challenge, and for the preservation of our species and indeed many others, that is the challenge we have to meet.